« Stop Dancing with a 'Default' Name & Partner up with a New One! by Ty Webb | Main | SLA Alignment Project Chat in Second Life: Tomorrow! »

16 November 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83458e35e69e20120a6a72257970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Clarification and Perspective on Name Change by Ruth Wolfish:

Comments

Chuck

You state that, "If we do not change our name now, another name will not be submitted".
Excuse me but didn't they say that the other two times they tried to change the name?

Lynn McBee

Sometimes standing still and resisting trends that seem persuasive just because they are new and suggest progress often prove that trends are short-lived. Land is finite as are librarians - since Alexandria Library days of old. Stand still and let this latest name change trend pass - Librarians.

jim schwartz


Professionals or Amateurs?

The name change that includes the words knowledge professional does not make sense. If you go through a list of occupations, there are numerous knowledge professionals: accountant, barber, cook, dancer, engineer, farmer, grocer, hair dresser, illustrator, jeweler, locksmith, mechanic, nurse, etc. All of these occupations require knowledge and those that have the knowledge are professionals not amateurs.

While I was speaking with a cab driver, he said he had extensive knowledge of various cities where he has worked. He also said that he was once a bartender and had to know how to mix many kinds of drinks. At the bar where he worked, there was a piano player who said he was just an amateur but the cabbie said he played like a professional. There was also a vocalist who said she was a professional but the cabbie said she sounded like an amateur.

Anne Mintz

In 2003 when we voted to change the name to Information Professionals International, it came very close to passing. Why wasn't that name an option this time? It certainly reflects what we do.

David Hook

@Anne Mintz:

The problem is that IPI did not get enough votes in order to pass in 2003. If SLA were to put that option up for a vote again, some of those opposed would feel that the board is having the membership vote on the same name over and over again until it eventually passes.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

About the SLA Blog

  • Welcome to the SLA Blog! This site will bring you useful information about the global information profession and about SLA.

Your email address:


Powered by FeedBlitz

  • Oral History Project
    The "Voices of SLA: an International Oral History" is an initiative of the Fellows of SLA in partnership with the SLA Centennial Commission. To learn more or to volunteer and/or to offer suggestions, go here.

February 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29